CSP-Assessor New Practice Questions - Free Sample CSP-Assessor Questions

One of the key factors for passing the exam is practice. Candidates must use CSP-Assessor practice test material to be able to perform at their best on the real exam. This is why FreeDumps has developed three formats to assist candidates in their Swift CSP-Assessor Preparation. These formats include desktop-based Swift CSP-Assessor practice test software, web-based practice test, and a PDF format.

Swift CSP-Assessor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Understanding the Swift Customer Security Programme: This domain is targeted at compliance officers, and risk managers involved in Swift operations. It evaluates the candidate's comprehension of the CSP controls framework and their ability to determine the appropriate architecture type and related scope as outlined in the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF).
Topic 2	Understanding the methodology and assessment deliverables: This section is designed for independent auditors working with Swift systems. It tests the candidate's grasp of the Assessor's role and obligations when conducting a CSP assessment. The section evaluates knowledge of key elements to consider during the assessment process.
Topic 3	Understanding Swift: This section of the exam measures the skills of Swift network administrators and covers Swift's crucial role in the international financial community, including the structure and operations of the Swift network and its infrastructure.

>> CSP-Assessor New Practice Questions <<

The Swift CSP-Assessor Exam Dumps In PDF File Format

Our CSP-Assessor study materials provide free trial service for consumers. If you are interested in our CSP-Assessor study materials, and you can immediately download and experience our trial question bank for free. Through the trial you will have different learning experience on CSP-Assessor exam guide , you will find that what we say is not a lie, and you will immediately fall in love with our products. As a key to the success of your life, the benefits that our CSP-Assessor Study Materials can bring you are not measured by money. CSP-Assessor test torrent can help you pass the exam in the shortest time.

Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification Sample Questions (Q11-Q16):

NEW QUESTION # 11
Which statement(s) is/are correct about the LSO/RSO accounts on a Swift Alliance Access? (Choose all that apply.)

A. They are responsible for the configuration and management of the security functions of the server
B. Their PKI certificates are stored either on a HSM Token or on a HSM-box
C. They are local Security Officers
D. They are the business profiles that can sign the Swift financial transactions

Answer: A,B,C

NEW QUESTION # 12
An application only uses (i) the SWIFT API for reporting and gpi basic tracker calls through (ii) a tailored account not allowing business transactions management. Is this application in scope of the CSCF? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls
*CSCF Assessment Completion Letter
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template

A. No, it is not in scope because the API connection method is not in scope of the CSP
B. No, it can be descoped because there is no business transaction management being performed
C. Yes, it is in scope because the API connection method is less secure than SWIFT interfaces
D. Yes, it is in scope and considered a customer connector because it reads business transaction data

Answer: B

Explanation:
The CSCF applies to all SWIFT users and components that handle SWIFT-related data or connectivity, including customer connectors and interfaces. The scope is defined by the "Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025" and the "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree." Let's evaluate the scenario and options:
*The application uses the SWIFT API for reporting and gpi basic tracker calls (e.g., tracking payment statuses via the SWIFT gpi Tracker) through a tailored account that does not allow business transaction management (e.g., creating or sending MT messages like MT103). This limits its functionality to read-only or monitoring activities.
*CSCF Scope: The CSCF applies to components that process or manage SWIFT business transactions (e.g., payment messages) or provide connectivity to the SWIFT network. The "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree" classifies components into architecture types (A1-A4), with customer connectors and interfaces in scope if they handle transactional data or enable SWIFT connectivity. Reporting and tracking via APIs, without transaction management, do not constitute business transaction processing.
*Option A: Yes, it is in scope and considered a customer connector because it reads business transaction data This is incorrect. While the application reads transaction data (e.g., via gpi Tracker), the CSCF scope is primarily focused on components that manage or transmit business transactions (e.g., creating or sending messages). Reading data for reporting purposes does not classify it as a customer connector requiring full CSCF compliance unless it also handles transactional flows. The "Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template" focuses on transactional interfaces.
*Option B: No, it can be descoped because there is no business transaction management being performed This is correct. Since the application does not manage business transactions (e.g., it cannot initiate or modify payments), it falls outside the primary scope of the CSCF. The "Independent Assessment Framework" allows for descoping of components that do not process transactional data, provided they are isolated from the SWIFT secure zone. This aligns with the "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree," which excludes non- transactional reporting tools from mandatory assessment.
*Option C: No, it is not in scope because the API connection method is not in scope of the CSP This is incorrect. The SWIFT API connection method is within the CSP scope if it interacts with SWIFT services (e.g., gpi Tracker), but the key factor is the lack of transaction management, not the API itself.
*Option D: Yes, it is in scope because the API connection method is less secure than SWIFT interfaces This is incorrect. Security of the connection method (e.g., API vs. traditional interfaces) does not determine CSCF scope. The scope is based on functionality (transaction management), and the statement's premise about security is not a valid criterion per CSCF guidelines.
Summary of Correct answer:
The application is not in scope of the CSCF and can be descoped because it does not perform business transaction management (B).
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025: Defines scope based on transaction management.
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree: Guides descoping of non-transactional components.
*Independent Assessment Framework: Allows descoping of reporting-only applications.
========

NEW QUESTION # 13
Using the outsourcing agent diagram. Which components must be placed in a secure zone? (Choose all that apply.)

A. Component C
B. Component B
C. Component D
D. Component A

Answer: A,C,D

Explanation:
The diagram provided represents a Swift user environment with an outsourcing agent, showing various components involved in the Swift workflow. The Swift Customer Security Programme (CSP) mandates specific security controls to protect critical components, particularly those handling Swift-related data or connectivity. Let's analyze the diagram and determine which components must be placed in asecure zoneas per theCSCF v2024.
Step 1: Understand the Secure Zone Requirement
Asecure zonein the Swift CSP context refers to a segregated, protected environment where critical Swift- related components are isolated from general-purpose systems to minimize risks. This is outlined inControl
1.1: Swift Environment Protectionof theCSCF v2024, which mandates that Swift infrastructure (e.g., messaging interfaces, connectors, and related systems) must be logically and physically separated from non- Swift systems. The secure zone ensures that only authorized systems and users can interact with Swift components.
Step 2: Analyze the Diagram and Identify Components
The diagram includes the following components:
* A. Middleware server (customer connector): Labeled as Component A, this server facilitates connectivity between the Swift user's systems and the outsourcing agent's infrastructure.
* B. General-purpose PC Operator GUI: This is a general-purpose system used by an operator to interact with the Swift environment.
* C. Swift-related OAA (Operational Application Architecture): Labeled as Component C, this represents the Swift messaging interface (e.g., Alliance Access/Entry) managed by the outsourcing agent.
* D. Customer connector: This component, within the outsourcing agent's environment, interfaces directly with the Swift connector or interface.
* E. Dedicated PC Admin users: This represents administrative systems used to manage the Swift environment.Additionally, there's aConnector or Interface(SB, L2BA, or Enabler) connecting to the Swift network.
Step 3: Determine Which Components Belong in a Secure Zone
* A. Middleware server (customer connector):This component facilitates connectivity between the Swift user and the outsourcing agent's Swift-related systems. According toControl 1.1: Swift Environment Protection, any system that directly interacts with the Swift messaging infrastructure (e.
g., as a connector) must reside in a secure zone to prevent unauthorized access or tampering. Since this middleware server is part of the Swift data flow, it must be in a secure zone.Conclusion: Component A must be in a secure zone.
* B. General-purpose PC Operator GUI:This is a general-purpose system used by operators, not a core Swift component. TheCSCF v2024underControl 1.2: Logical Access Controlrecommends that operator systems (e.g., GUIclients) should not reside in the same secure zone as critical Swift infrastructure to avoid introducing vulnerabilities from general-purpose systems. These systems typically connect to the secure zone via controlled interfaces (e.g., VPN or jump servers) but are not part of it.Conclusion: Component B does not need to be in a secure zone.
* C. Swift-related OAA:This represents the Swift messaging interface (e.g., Alliance Access/Entry), which is a core component of the Swift environment.Control 1.1explicitly requires that messaging interfaces be placed in a secure zone to protect them from external threats and ensure segregation from non-Swift systems. Since this component is directly involved in Swift message processing, it must be in a secure zone.Conclusion: Component C must be in a secure zone.
* D. Customer connector:This connector interfaces directly with the Swift connector or interface (SB, L2BA, or Enabler) to facilitate communication with the Swift network. As perControl 1.1, any component that directly connects to the Swift network or handles Swift traffic must be in a secure zone to ensure end-to-end security of the communication chain. This applies to the customer connector within the outsourcing agent's environment.Conclusion: Component D must be in a secure zone.
* E. Dedicated PC Admin users:Administrative systems used to manage the Swift environment are typically not placed in the same secure zone as the operational Swift components. According toControl
1.2: Logical Access Control, administrative access should be tightly controlled and segregated, often using jump servers or bastion hosts to access the secure zone. While these systems need secure access, they are not part of the secure zone itself.Conclusion: Component E does not need to be in a secure zone.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
Based on theCSCF v2024requirements, the components that must be placed in a secure zone are those directly involved in Swift message processing or connectivity to the Swift network. These are:
* A. Middleware server (customer connector)
* C. Swift-related OAA
* D. Customer connectorComponent B (general-purpose PC) and Component E (admin PC) are not required to be in the secure zone, as they are operator or administrative systems that should be segregated from the Swift operational environment.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 1.1: Swift Environment Protection.
* Swift Customer Security Programme - Security Best Practices, Section: Secure Zone Configuration.
* CSCF v2024, Control 1.2: Logical Access Control.

NEW QUESTION # 14
What does the CSCF expect in terms of Database Integrity? (Choose all that apply.)

A. Nothing is needed when the messaging or connector integrates/embeds an integrity check functionality at each Swift transaction record level.
B. When a database is used by a messaging interface or connector, the related hosted database and its supporting system must be protected as a Swift-related component and exceptions alerted
C. Alerts generated from performed integrity checks are captured and analysed for appropriate treatment

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
This question addresses database integrity expectations under theSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024.
Step 1: Understand Database Integrity Requirements
TheCSCF v2024, underControl 2.7: Database Integrity, mandates protection and monitoring of databases supporting Swift-related components to ensure data integrity and detect anomalies.
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
* A. Nothing is needed when the messaging or connector integrates/embeds an integrity check functionality at each Swift transaction record levelIncorrect. Even with embedded checks,Control
2.7requires additional protection and monitoring of the database and supporting systems, not just reliance on transaction-level checks.Conclusion: Incorrect.
* B. When a database is used by a messaging interface or connector, the related hosted database and its supporting system must be protected as a Swift-related component and exceptions alerted Correct.Control 2.7requires that databases supporting messaging interfaces or connectors be secured (e.
g., in a secure zone) and that exceptions (e.g., integrity breaches) be alerted, per theCSCF v2024.
Conclusion: Correct.
* C. Alerts generated from performed integrity checks are captured and analysed for appropriate treatmentCorrect.Control 2.7andControl 6.1: Security Event Loggingmandate capturing and analyzing integrity check alerts to address potential issues, as detailed in theSwift Security Best Practices
.Conclusion: Correct.
Step 3: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answers areB and C, as these align withControl 2.7andControl 6.1requirements for database integrity and monitoring in theCSCF v2024.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 2.7: Database Integrity, Control
6.1: Security Event Logging.
* Swift Security Best Practices, Section: Database Security.

NEW QUESTION # 15
The SWIFT PKI certificates are used for... (Select the correct answer)
*Connectivity
*Generic
*Products Cloud
*Products OnPrem
*Security

A. Asymmetric signing only
B. Asymmetric signing and encryption end to end
C. Symmetric encryption only
D. Asymmetric signing and encryption end to SWIFT only

Answer: B

Explanation:
SWIFT Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificates are cryptographic credentials used to secure communications over the SWIFT network. Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: Asymmetric signing and encryption end to end
This is correct. SWIFT PKI certificates utilize asymmetric cryptography (public and private key pairs) for both signing and encryption. Signing ensures the authenticity and integrity of messages (e.g., verifying the sender), while encryption provides confidentiality end to end-from the sender's environment to the receiver' s environment across the SWIFT network. This end-to-end security is achieved using PKI certificates managed by Hardware Security Modules (HSMs), as mandated by CSCF Control "1.3 Cryptographic Failover." SWIFT documentation confirms that PKI supports full message security throughout the transmission process.
*Option B: Asymmetric signing and encryption end to SWIFT only
This is incorrect. The security provided by PKI certificates extends beyond just the connection to SWIFT (e.
g., to the SWIFT Secure IP Network). It covers the entire message journey, including the recipient's environment, ensuring end-to-end protection rather than stopping at SWIFT's boundary.
*Option C: Symmetric encryption only
This is incorrect. SWIFT PKI relies on asymmetric cryptography for key exchange and signing, not symmetric encryption alone. While symmetric encryption may be used internally (e.g., for session keys derived from asymmetric key exchange), the PKI certificates themselves are based on asymmetric algorithms (e.g., RSA), as outlined in SWIFT's security guidelines.
*Option D: Asymmetric signing only
This is incorrect. PKI certificates are used for both asymmetric signing (for authenticity and integrity) and encryption (for confidentiality), not just signing. The dual purpose is essential for the secure transmission of SWIFT messages.
Summary of Correct answer:
SWIFT PKI certificates are used for asymmetric signing and encryption end to end (A), ensuring comprehensive security.
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024: Control 1.3 specifies the use of PKI for end- to-end security.
*SWIFT Security Guidelines: Details PKI usage for asymmetric signing and encryption.
*SWIFT PKI Documentation: Confirms end-to-end cryptographic protection using PKI certificates.
========

NEW QUESTION # 16
......

We know making progress and getting the certificate of CSP-Assessor study materials will be a matter of course with the most professional experts in command of the newest and the most accurate knowledge in it. Our Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification exam prep has taken up a large part of market. with decided quality to judge from customers' perspective, If you choose the right CSP-Assessor Practice Braindumps, it will be a wise decision. Our behavior has been strictly ethical and responsible to you, which is trust worthy.

Free Sample CSP-Assessor Questions: https://www.freedumps.top/CSP-Assessor-real-exam.html

0

Course Enrolled

0

Course Completed

Jim Stark Jim Stark

About me

CSP-Assessor New Practice Questions - Free Sample CSP-Assessor Questions

Swift CSP-Assessor Exam Syllabus Topics:

The Swift CSP-Assessor Exam Dumps In PDF File Format

Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification Sample Questions (Q11-Q16):

0

0

로그인